HRPP Manual Section 4-6
Responsibilities of Researchers
Any individual who is engaged in conducting a human subject research study that is under the jurisdiction of the Michigan State University (MSU) Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) is responsible for carrying out sound ethical research consistent with research plans either approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB), or determined exempt. Each individual is required to comply with all IRB determinations, appropriate MSU policies and procedures, and all applicable laws and regulations related to human research protection. See HRPP Manual 4-1 “Applicability.”
These responsibilities extend to individuals (e.g., all investigators, research staff, employees, students) engaged in conducting human subject research. The responsibilities listed below summarize the requirements detailed in other sections of the HRPP Manual and federal regulations.
These responsibilities include, but are not limited to:
-
Obtain required training on human subject research prior to commencing any research activities that involve interaction or intervention with human subjects or their identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens. See HRPP Manual 11-1-A “Education: Investigators and Research Staff.”
-
Disclose financial conflicts of interest. See HRPP Manual 10-1 “Conflict of Interest.”
-
Obtain MSU IRB approval, acknowledgement of reliance upon an External (non-MSU) IRB, or an exempt determination before involving human subjects in research. This is generally a responsibility of the Principal Investigator (PI). See “PI Responsibilities” section below. However, it applies to all individuals, including graduate students conducting human subject research for their thesis, dissertation, or medical education requirement. See HRPP Manual 9-2 “Noncompliance.”
-
Use recruitment processes that are fair and equitable. See HRPP Manual 6-5 “Selection of Subjects and Recruitment.”
-
Obtain and document informed consent of subjects or subjects’ legally authorized representatives prior to the subjects’ participation in the research, unless these requirements have been waived by the reviewing IRB for non-exempt research. See HRPP Manual 6-4-A “Informed Consent: Documentation of Informed Consent.”
-
Monitor research subjects for potential harm and take steps to minimize or mitigate those harms when possible. See HRPP Manual 6-7 “Data and Safety Monitoring” and 9-1 “Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others.”
-
Report any activities or circumstances that affect the rights and/or welfare of research subjects, including subject complaints or questions, directly to the reviewing IRB, MSU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) and/or to the PI. See HRPP Manual 4-8 “Reporting Policy.”
-
Report suspected or confirmed non-compliance to the reviewing IRB and/or MSU HRPP. Mechanisms for reporting include written notice, electronic notice (irb@msu.edu), or by phone (517-355-2180). See HRPP Manual 4-8 “Reporting Policy.” See HRPP Manual 5-6 “Contact Information.”
-
Maintain, manage, and retain research data and records relating to the research as required by applicable policies and regulations. See HRPP Manual 4-7 “Record Keeping,” 4-7-A “Recordkeeping for Investigators,” and MSU guidelines on “Research Data: Management, Control, and Access.”
-
Contact the MSU HRPP if there are any questions about whether an activity involves human subject research and/or clinical investigation. See HRPP Manual 4-3 “Determination of Human Subject Research.”
Principal (Responsible) Investigator Responsibilities
PIs have additional responsibilities for the oversight and conduct of human subject research studies, including hiring qualified staff, ensuring that the staff have current training on ethical human subject research and applicable rules, following the IRB-approved research study, promptly reporting any potential non-compliance or unanticipated problems, maintaining IRB approval throughout the duration of the human research, and maintaining oversight over the recruitment, consent, and research procedures. See HRPP Manual 4-9 “Principal Investigator” for who can be a PI on a human research study. See HRPP Manual 6-9-B, “Graduate Student Research” for special considerations when the research project is conducted to fulfill graduate degree requirements.
Specific responsibilities of PIs include, but are not limited to:
-
Ensure that individuals conducting human subject research (e.g. research staff) receive appropriate training prior to contact with research subjects or their identifiable private information. See HRPP Manual 11-1-A “Education: Investigators and Research Staff.”
-
Maintain adequate and appropriate oversight over the conduct of the research study. Co-investigators and other members of the research team must adhere to appropriate policies and ethical standards related to the protection of human subjects. The PI is held responsible for the conduct of the research personnel (e.g. co-investigator, investigators, and research staff).
-
Use sound scientific study design in the research protocol and obtain peer review of the research study as appropriate (e.g., thesis committee review, sponsor peer review, academic unit review. See HRPP Manual 6-2-A “Minimization of Risks: Sound Research Design.”
-
Use research designs that appropriately protect human subjects’ privacy and confidentiality of their information. See HRPP Manual 6-6 “Privacy, Confidentiality, and Anonymity.”
-
Ensure that adequate resources are available to protect human subjects during the proposed research. See HRPP Manual 6-2-B “Minimization of Risks: Adequate Resources.”
-
Ensure informed consent is sought from each prospective subject or the subject's legally authorized representative, in accordance with, and to the extent required by, 45 CFR 46.116 and/or 21 CFR 50 Subpart B.
-
Obtain MSU IRB approval, acknowledgement of reliance upon an External IRB, or an MSU HRPP exempt determination before involving human subjects in research and/or clinical investigation.
-
Submit an application to the MSU IRB and obtain MSU IRB approval, acknowledgement of reliance upon an External IRB, or an MSU HRPP exempt determination of any planned activity that meets the definition of research involving a human subject (Common Rule 45 CFR 46), or the definition of clinical investigation involving a human subject (FDA regulations 21 CFR 50 and 56). See HRPP Manual 4-3 “Determination of Human Subject Research” and 8-1 “Exemptions.”
-
Obtain IRB approval (or reliance) at each engaged non-MSU collaborating site. See HRPP Manual 6-9-F “Special Considerations: Multiple Research Sites,” 8-2 “Expedited Review Procedure,” and 8-5 “Initial Review.”
-
-
For studies where the exempt category requires limited IRB review under the Revised Common Rule (2018 Requirements):
-
Report any proposed changes in the research study that may impact the limited IRB review criteria.
-
For Exemption Category (2)(iii) and 3(iii), any proposed change to the provisions to protect the privacy of subjects and to maintain the confidentiality of data or that may impact those provisions must be submitted as a Modification for IRB review and approval before initiation of the changes.
-
Submit a study closure.
-
-
Report any of the following to the MSU HRPP/IRB (see HRPP Manual 4-8 “Reporting Policy”):
-
Any unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others. See HRPP Manual 9-1 “Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others.”
-
Any potential or confirmed non-compliance with the regulations or the requirements or determinations of the IRB. See HRPP Manual 9-2 “Noncompliance.”
-
Emergency use of investigational drugs or devices. See HRPP Manual 7-3 “Emergency Use of Investigational Drugs and Devices.”
-
Premature completion of the study, completion of the study, or closure of the research. See HRPP Manual 8-9 “Closure.”
-
Any modifications, information, or unexpected or adverse events that would increase the risk or change the status of a study determined exempt by the IRB. See HRPP Manual 8-1 “Exemptions.”
-
Any subject complaints, including exempt studies. See HRPP Manual 9-4 “Subject Complaints.”
-
Any other circumstance that affects the rights and/or welfare of research subjects.
-
-
If MSU is relying upon an External IRB, follow all requirements related to External IRB submissions. See HRPP Manual 8-11 “External IRB Submissions or 8-11-A “External IRB Submissions Involving Henry Ford Health Employed Principal Investigators.”
-
Obtain prior approval from the reviewing IRB for any modifications of the previously approved non-exempt research, including modifications to the informed consent process and document, except those necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to subjects. See HRPP Manual 8-6 “Modifications to an Approved Research Study.”
-
When continuing review is required, submit an application for renewed approval to the reviewing IRB for non-exempt research in sufficient time to allow for IRB review prior to the expiration date of current approval. See HRPP Manual 8-7 “Renewed Approval” (for requirements), 8-2 “Expedited Review Procedure” (for typical review times), and 8-3 “Full Board Review Procedure” (for typical review times).
-
Keep records relating to the research as required by MSU and applicable regulations after completion of the research study for a minimum of three years, or longer depending on the funding agency and type of record. This requirement also applies to research records for student research conducted under the supervision of the PI. See HRPP Manual 4-7 “Record Keeping,” 4-7-A “Recordkeeping for Investigators,” and MSU guidelines on “Research Data: Management, Control, and Access.”
-
Keep a log documenting oral consent process if applicable. See HRPP Manual 6-4-A “Informed Consent: Documentation of Informed Consent.”
-
Post the clinical trial consent form or assure such posting takes place, when required. See HRPP Manual 6-4-F “Posting of Clinical Trial Consent Forms.”
-
If a human subject involved in ongoing research becomes a prisoner during the course of the study, and the relevant research was not reviewed and approved by the IRB in accordance with the requirements for research involving prisoners under subpart C of 45 CFR part 46, the investigator must promptly notify the reviewing IRB. See HRPP Manual 6-8-B “Prisoners.”
-
Promptly respond to site visit requests. See HRPP Manual 8-10 “Site Visits.”
This policy and procedure supersedes those previously drafted.
Approved By: Vice President of Research and Graduate Studies, 3-9-2008. Revision 1 approved by VP Research & Graduate Studies on 7-21-2011. Revision 2 approved by Assistant VP Regulatory Affairs on 11-24-2015. Revision 3 approved by Senior VP for Research and Innovation on 1-18-2019. Revision 4 approved by Associate VP Research Regulatory Support on 11-18-2025.
Related HRPP Manual Sections
- 4-1, Applicability
- 4-3, Determination of Human Subject Research
- 4-7, Recordkeeping
- 4-7-A, Recordkeeping for Investigators
- 4-8, Reporting Policy
- 4-9, Principal Investigator
- 5-6, Contact Information
- 6-2-A, Minimization of Risks - Scholarly Review
- 6-2-B, Minimization of Risks - Adequate Resources
- 6-4-A, Informed Consent: Documentation of Informed Consent
- 6-4-F, Posting of Clinical Trial Consent Forms
- 6-5, Selection of Subjects and Recruitment
- 6-6, Privacy, Confidentiality, and Anonymity
- 6-7, Data and Safety Monitoring
- 6-8-B, Prisoners
- 6-9-B, Graduate Student Research
- 6-9-F, Multiple Research Sites
- 7-3, Emergency Use of Investigational Drugs and Devices
- 8-1, Exemptions
- 8-2, Expedited Review Procedure
- 8-3 Full Board Review Procedure
- 8-5, Initial Review
- 8-6, Revisions to an Approved Project
- 8-7, Renewed Approval
- 8-9, Closure
- 8-10, Site Visits
- 8-11, External IRB Submissions
- 8-11-A, External IRB Submissions Involving Henry Ford Health Employed Principal Investigators
- 9-1, Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others
- 9-2, Noncompliance
- 9-4, Subject Complaints
- 10-1, Conflict of Interest
- 11-1-A, Education - Investigators and Research Staff